Journal de chirurgie universelle

  • ISSN: 2254-6758
  • Indice h du journal: 8
  • Note de citation du journal: 1.33
  • Facteur d’impact du journal: 1.34
Indexé dans
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Répertoire d'indexation des revues de recherche (DRJI)
  • OCLC - WorldCat
  • Pub européen
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMÉO
Partager cette page

Abstrait

OSAS Surgery and Postoperative Inconvenience: Stage I Surgery versus Stage II Surgery

Gasparini Giulio

This think about points to examine the reasons that debilitate the patients influenced by OSAS to experience orthognathic surgery and compares the postoperative distress of stage I (delicate tissue surgery) and stage II (orthognathic surgery) methods for treatment of OSAS. Fabric and Strategies . A pool of 46 patients influenced by OSAS was partitioned into two bunches: “surgery patients” who acknowledged surgical medications of their condition and “no surgery patients” who denied surgical methods. The “surgery patients” bunch was assist subdivided into two arms: patients who acknowledged stage I methods (IP) and those who acknowledged stage II (IIP). To way better get it the inspirations behind the refusal of II stage strategies, we inquired the patients having a place to both the IP gather and “no surgery” gather to show the most reason that impacted their choice to maintain a strategic distance from II stage methods. We moreover checked and compared five parameters of postoperative distress: torment, painkiller presumption.

Keywords

Surgical; Painkiller; Edema; Apnea; Distress

Avertissement: Ce résumé a été traduit à l'aide d'outils d'intelligence artificielle et n'a pas encore été examiné ni vérifié