Annales de la recherche clinique et de laboratoire

  • ISSN: 2386-5180
  • Indice h du journal: 17
  • Note de citation du journal: 6.26
  • Facteur d’impact du journal: 5.31
Indexé dans
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Infrastructure nationale des connaissances en Chine (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Répertoire d'indexation des revues de recherche (DRJI)
  • Publions
  • Pub européen
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMÉO
  • Laboratoires secrets des moteurs de recherche
Partager cette page

Abstrait

Diagnostic Laboratory Markers for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Toru Shizuma \r\n\r\n \\r\\n\\r\\n \r\n\r\n \\\\r\\\\n \r\n\r\n \\r\\n \r\n

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an often-lifethreatening bacterial infection in patients with liver cirrhosis with ascites. Useful laboratory methods for early diagnosis are essential. The gold standard method for the diagnosis of SBP is a polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count of ≥250 cells/mm3 in the ascitic fluid. Some studies have investigated the usefulness of other novel laboratory methods for the diagnosis of SBP. This paper reviews studies of diagnostic markers for SBP, such as procalcitonin, calprotectin, and leukocyte esterase reagent strips in ascitic fluid. At present, serum procalcitonin is a relatively sensitive and specific marker for the diagnosis of SBP. The usefulness of ascitic levels of procalcitonin and calprotectin for differentiating between SBP and sterile ascites is still uncertain because of the small number of studies. Although the sensitivity of leukocyte esterase reagent strips for diagnosing SBP is variable, a negative test result may predict absence of SBP.

\r\n\r\n

\\r\\n\\r\\n

\r\n\r\n

\\\\r\\\\n

\r\n\r\n

\\r\\n

\r\n

Avertissement: Ce résumé a été traduit à l'aide d'outils d'intelligence artificielle et n'a pas encore été examiné ni vérifié