Journal of FisheriesSciences.com

  • Indice h du journal: 30
  • Note de citation du journal: 25.50
  • Facteur d’impact du journal: 21.90
Indexé dans
  • Base de données des revues académiques
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Le facteur d'impact global (GIF)
  • Infrastructure nationale des connaissances en Chine (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Bibliothèque des revues électroniques
  • Centre international pour l'agriculture et les biosciences (CABI)
  • Répertoire d'indexation des revues de recherche (DRJI)
  • OCLC - WorldCat
  • Invocation de Proquête
  • Publions
  • MIAR
  • Indice scientifique avancé
  • Google Scholar
  • Résumé chimique
  • SHERPA ROMÉO
  • Laboratoires secrets des moteurs de recherche
  • ResearchGate
  • Université de Barcelone
Partager cette page

Abstrait

Assessment of the Optimal Replacement Levels of Maize with Water Lettuce Leaf (Pistia Stratiotes) based Diets for Clarias gariepinus

Adedokun MA, Tairu HM, Adeosun O and Ajibola O

A 56 days-feeding trial was carried out to investigate the effects of Water Lettuce Leaf Meal as a partial replacement for Yellow Maize Meal in the practical diets for the freshwater mud catfish (Clarias gariepinus) juveniles. Five diets in which WLLM replaced YMM at 0%, 25%, 50%,75% and 100%; designated as Diet 1(control), Diet 2, Diet 3, Diet 4 and Diet 5 respectively. The replacement levels were prepared and fed to Clarias gariepinus juveniles. At the end of the feeding experiment, the replacement effects on the growth and nutrient utilization indices; weight gain(WG), specific growth rate (SGR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), Food conversion ratio (FCR), percentage survival rate (PSR) and total fish production (TFP)were determined. The treatment fed with control diet 1 WLLM (0%) gave growth and nutrient utilization results as expected. Weight gain (70.60 g) in WLLM (Diet 1) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than 38.32 g for WLLM (Diet 5), but not significantly higher than 69.70g for WLLM (50%). Also, SGR 3.10 g/day (diet 3) was significantly higher than other diets except control diet 1(0%) WLLM. Likewise, FCR observed in the group fed control diet 1(2.45) was not significantly better than diet 2 (2.69) and diet 3 (2.53). Empirically, There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the feed efficiency of practical diets 1, 2 and 3; PSR in the group fed 50% WLLM (86.67) was significantly different than values observed in groups fed other diets. Hence, made diet 3 (50% WLLM) having incredible total fish production value of 7.49 kg/m3.

Avertissement: Ce résumé a été traduit à l'aide d'outils d'intelligence artificielle et n'a pas encore été examiné ni vérifié