Revue des sciences de la santé

  • ISSN: 1108-7366
  • Indice h du journal: 51
  • Note de citation du journal: 10.69
  • Facteur d’impact du journal: 9.13
Indexé dans
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Infrastructure nationale des connaissances en Chine (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL complet
  • Scimago
  • Bibliothèque des revues électroniques
  • Répertoire d'indexation des revues de recherche (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC - WorldCat
  • Commission des bourses universitaires
  • Fondation genevoise pour la formation et la recherche médicales
  • Pub européen
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMÉO
  • Laboratoires secrets des moteurs de recherche
Partager cette page

Abstrait

A Comparative Study between Sleeve Suture Technique and Oblique Cut Technique in Arterial Micro-Anastomosis of Size-Mismatched Vessels in a Rat Model

Fatma Youssef Ahmed*, Ebopras Febrbs1, Wael Sakr, Md, Wael Elshaer Md

Background: Microsurgical reconstruction is employed for complex plastic surgery problems when other options don't seem to be satisfactory either functional or aesthetic Aim: to evaluate sleeve suture technique and oblique cut technique in end-to-end micro-anastomosis of vessels with size discrepancy in a Rat model regarding patency of the anastomosis and feasibility of the technique

Methods: Thirteen Samples were included in this study and randomly assigned to either Group Ι (Sleeve suture technique) or Group Ι (Oblique cut technique). The main assessment parameters were anastomosis patency, time of anastomosis, and the number of suture units. Other parameters included anaesthesia consumption, thrombosis rate, and leakage after anastomosis.

Results: Nearly equal patency rates have been found in the two techniques in the animal model, although the invagination technique was faster and technically simpler to perform with less suture unit consumption. The oblique cut technique showed a highly statistically significant increase in the anastomosis time and an increased in sutures number in comparison to the sleeve technique plus the necessity to flip-flop the wall for posterior wall suturing.

Conclusion: No patency advantage of one technique over the other. However, in the experimental model used, it was found that the invagination technique was faster and technically simpler to perform. Flow-through the invagination was nearly equal to that through the oblique cut end-to-end.

Avertissement: Ce résumé a été traduit à l'aide d'outils d'intelligence artificielle et n'a pas encore été examiné ni vérifié